Very important information!


















Comments

  1. PeterMay 9, 2020 at 7:10 PM

    Hahaha. Nice sell here, I clicked. Also laughed aloud, thank you.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Rush: Chapter 1 (58-68)

One of the things I think about when I read passages about these artists is, what did they think about themselves? Like, there seems to be some pretentiousness about calling yourself an artist, as we discussed in this class, around Martin Creed, I think ("What the fuck am I doing?"). I don't know, maybe I'm projecting my self-doubt on others, because it's hard for me to reckon someone without self-doubt. Like does Mühl take himself completely seriously? Is Scheiss-Kerl supposed to be serious and profound? I know that rocking people's assumptions is part of art, but really? I know, art doesn't have to be serious; I guess simply prompting disgust in the viewer could be a legitimate goal. Others, however, looking at the "'bathetic sadomasochism', of the Aktion artists, whether directed towards men and more specifically towards women, fatally undermines their claims to liberation, catharsis and expiation" (A.L. Rees).
Read more

Rush: Chapter 1 (36-46)

This section makes me think about how some of Rauschenberg's performances would not be possible in our current COVID-19 environment. Especially Open Score (Bong) , which had 500 volunteer performers. I'm sure there are ways to make something similar with social distancing, but certainly not on the scale of 500 performers in close quarters. What art will emerge out of this experience? I'm thinking of a performance that happens behind Plexiglas, and each viewer must mask and glove up in their own Plexiglas observer booth, then use disinfectant to clean their booth before departing.
Read more

Rush: Chapter 1 (47-57)

I think this section really challenged me to expand my idea of what art is. While I can appreciate Nauman's Clown Torture as amusing and maybe a little disturbing, some of the other performances , such as Pier Martons's Performance for Video , where he beats himself with a guitar until it disintegrates, may make a particular statement, but it's also hard to distinguish from possible mental illness. I think we might've discussed something like this in class. What distinguishes some art from mental illness? Can it be both? Probably. Some of Muehl's performances (pg 56) border on the latter, or certainly deviant and possibly criminal.
Read more